Legal Opinion

Handel v. Long Trusts

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 23, 1988No. 9624PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

The Long Trusts brought an action against Mannesmann Handel (hereinafter referred to as Handel) and others for damages allegedly caused by defective materials. The Long Trusts were awarded a judgment and Handel appeals.

Handel brings four points of error contending that the trial court erred: (1) in allowing an undisclosed expert to testify over objection, (2) in granting Armco Steel’s motion for a directed verdict dismissing Armco from the case, (3) in excluding the deposition testimony of Bill Cox, and (4) in excluding deposition testimony of Pete Long.

The Long Trusts are engaged in oil and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Turner, Collie & Braden, Inc. v. Brookhollow, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Saucier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1950
  3. Hall v. HallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  4. Smith v. LancasterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. In Re Estate of PriceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Reid Road Municipal Utility District No. 2 v. Speedy Stop Food Stores, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Volunteer Council of Denton State School, Inc. v. Berry, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  4. Kokes v. Angelina College, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2004
  5. Mobil Oil Corp. v. Floyd, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1991

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API