People v. Costello
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtIrving Lang, J.
The defendant stands convicted, after a jury trial, of the crime of promoting prostitution in the second degree. After verdict, the defendant moved for a dismissal on the ground that the statute defining prostitution (Penal Law, § 230.00) is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad and that in this enlightened century "recreational sex” is a basic right immune from penal sanctions.
Section 230.00 of the Penal Law defines prostitution as follows: "A person is guilty of prostitution when such person engages or agrees or offers to engage in sexual conduct with another person in return for a fee.”
The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- People v. PagnottaNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Gold v. LomenzoNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- People v. Block, New York County Courts1972
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. Carlos Herrera, Victor Hugo Herrera, and Felipe Santiago Herrera, A/k/a"chiquito"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Commonwealth v. PottsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- State v. ZuanichWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- Commonwealth v. WalterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Tisdale v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.