Legal Opinion
Hillery v. Pulley
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 9, 1982No. Civil S-78-594 LKKPublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KARLTON, District Judge.
For the second time 1 I turn to the extremely difficult procedural problems tendered by this petition for habeas corpus. 2
Despite the long history of federal review of state convictions under habeas corpus, 3 a remarkable number of important procedural questions have received little or no attention. This Opinion addresses some of these crucial questions of procedure as well as important substantive issues. In essence, I first decide here that under certain circumstances a respondent may, with leave of court, move to dismiss a petition for habeas…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Vasquez v. HillerySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Landano v. RaffertyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Hillery v. PulleyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1983
- Nelson v. BiterDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014
- Booker T. Hillery, Jr. v. Reginald Pulley, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.