Tyner v. Nicholson (In Re Nicholson)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
KWAN, Bankruptcy Judge.
Chapter 7 debtors, Laurence R. Nicholson and Joyce V. Nicholson amended their bankruptcy schedules to claim an exemption in shares of stock in Applied Science, Inc. (“ASI”). The trustee objected to the amendment on the ground that the debtors had claimed the exemption in bad faith. Karen Tyner, who had joined in the trustee’s objection, and ASI appeal the bankruptcy court’s order overruling the objection and denying the appellants’ request for an evidentiary hearing. 2 We hold that the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion by not conducting an…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Ellsworth v. Lifescape Medical Associates, P.C. (In Re Ellsworth)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Elliott v. Weil (In Re Elliott)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Caviata Attached Homes, LLC v. U.S. Bank, National Ass'n (In Re Caviata Attached Homes, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- In re TallericoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2015
- In re PasheneeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2015
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.