Helgeson v. Ochs

Following non-jury trial, the trial court entered “Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Judgment.” In that document, the court noted that due to a previous case “and conflicting legal descriptions, the ownership and location of the roadway is in dispute.” The court then determined that Plaintiff was the owner of a 20-foot strip, but “ordered that a survey be had to determine the location of the roadway with certainty.”

Plaintiff was to obtain such a survey, and apparently the same was filed with the court. Defendants-Appellants sought to have the judgment “amended to clarify the location…