Coleman v. Woolley

Judge Ewing

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

Woolley and wife exhibited their bill in chancery* against Coleman, Didlake, Hancock apd Boon, alleging that Woolley and wife had contracted with Coleman, to convey to him the eastwardly half of a lot in Louisville,, and by mistake had conveyed to him the westwardly half of the same. That they, not observing the mistake, had afterwards conveyed the same half to Hancock and Boon, who had made valuable improvements thereon, with the knowledge of Coleman, who did not pretend to claim the property until considerable improvements had been made. That…