Legal Opinion

Forrester v. Penn Lyon Homes, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 21, 2009No. 07-2171PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge:

Penn Lyon Homes, Inc. and PLH Erectors, Inc. (collectively Penn Lyon) appeal from the district court’s order denying their motion to stay court proceedings and compel arbitration of Barbara and Gary Forrester’s claims against Penn Lyon. Before moving to compel arbitration, Penn Lyon engaged in extensive litigation measures that caused the Forresters actual prejudice. For this reason, Penn Lyon has defaulted the right to arbitration, and we therefore affirm.

I

On September 29, 2005, the Forresters filed a complaint in state court against Penn Lyon for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,231 William C. Fraser v. Merrill Lynch Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. Franklyn C. Shulman Allan G. KenzieCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
  2. Carolina Throwing Company, Inc. v. S & E Novelty Corporation and Rome Knitting MillsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Iraq Middle Market Development Foundation v. HarmooshCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
  2. Antonia Rota-McLarty v. Santander Consumer USA, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  3. Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc. v. CahillCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  4. Hooper v. Advance America, Cash Advance Centers of Missouri, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  5. Wheeling Hospital, Inc. v. Health Plan of the Upper Ohio Valley, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API