Legal Opinion

Tripi v. Cocca

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 30, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The action is by a vendee, first, to amend a written contract of purchase and sale of real estate by inserting a law date; and second, to recover from the vendor a down-payment and incidental expenses, and, if necessary, to have a lien declared *344and a sale as in foreclosure to enforce such lien. The plaintiff has recovered in full.

The transaction involved so much in the way of mutual postponement and efforts made on both sides to clear the title of appaient incumbrances that — in the absence of a law day in the contract — defendants were entitled to a reasonable time for fulfillment. (Trainor…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brokaw v. . DuffyNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. John F. Trainor Co. v. G. Amsinck & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tripi v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  2. Tripi v. CoccaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API