Legal Opinion · Dissent

Disciplinary Counsel v. Engel

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 2012No. 2011-1722Published

1DissentLundberg Stratton, J.

{¶ 14} I respectfully dissent. The panel adopted Engel’s proposed sanction of a public reprimand, and the board adopted the panel’s report in its entirety. The relator recommended a stayed six-month license suspension. However, this court has increased the sanction to a six-month actual suspension.

{¶ 15} The parties stipulated that three mitigating factors are present: the absence of a prior disciplinary record, cooperation with the disciplinary process, and the imposition of the additional penalties of criminal convictions and sentences. The board accepted these mitigating factors and also…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. ForbesOhio Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API