Taylor v. Commonwealth

Opinion by

Judge Doyle,

Before this Court are preliminary objections to a ‘ ‘ complaint in mandamus ’ ’ filed before us in our orig*488inal jurisdiction.1 Petitioners, who are purchasers of automobile insurance, allege, inter alia, that the Respondent, Insurance Department (Department) has failed to enforce mandatory provisions of the Pennsylvania No-fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act2 (No-fault Act) in that the Commissioner of Insurance (Commissioner) has failed in his duty pursuant to Section 105 of the No-fault Act to maintain a plan assuring that “required no-fault benefits and tort liability…