Continental Screen Co. v. Commissioner
United States Board of Tax Appeals
In 1924 the petitioner was served with a notice of complaint by the Federal Trade Commission, in which violation of the Sherman Act by the petitioner was alleged and a date set for hearing before the Commission. The petitioner employed eminent counsel to defend it against such charge. On October 14, 1925, the Commission entered an order dismissing the complaint.
Read the full summary
In 1924 the petitioner was served with a notice of complaint by the Federal Trade Commission, in which violation of the Sherman Act by the petitioner was alleged and a date set for hearing before the Commission. The petitioner employed eminent counsel to defend it against such charge. On October 14, 1925, the Commission entered an order dismissing the complaint. The petitioner paid bills as rendered by its attorneys for services in 1925 and 1926 in the amounts of $40,000 and $15,000, respectively. Held that the amounts paid as attorneys' fees were deductible from gross income as ordinary and…
1Opinion of the Court
CONTINENTAL SCREEN CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.
Continental Screen Co. v. Commissioner
Docket No. 30350.
United States Board of Tax Appeals
19 B.T.A. 1095; 1930 BTA LEXIS 2254;
May 26, 1930, Promulgated
In 1924 the petitioner was served with a notice of complaint by the Federal Trade Commission, in which violation of the Sherman Act by the petitioner was alleged and a date set for hearing before the Commission. The petitioner employed eminent counsel to defend it against such charge. On October 14, 1925, the Commission entered an order dismissing the complaint.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kornhauser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Backer v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1924
- F. Meyer & Bro. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926
- Continental Screen Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1930
- Stephens v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1925