Legal Opinion

Carter v. Township of Bordentown

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 20, 2007PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hoens

Bordentown Police Officer John Carter was served with a series of disciplinary notices charging him with, among other things, sleeping on duty. Although the Merit System Board upheld the penalty of termination for that offense, the Appellate Division reversed, concluding that imposition of that sanction violated the principle of progressive discipline. We granted the Township of Bordentown’s petition for certification, 188 N.J. 217, 902 A.2d 1234 (2006), and we now reverse and reinstate the penalty imposed by the Board.

I

Carter has been a police officer in Bordentown since 1991. Because of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mayflower Securities Co. v. Bureau of SecuritiesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  2. Henry v. Rahway State PrisonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  3. Campbell v. Department of Civil ServiceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  4. In Re the Revocation of the License of PolkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  5. Greenwood v. State Police Training CenterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re CarterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  2. IN THE MATTER OF ANTONIO CRUZ, CITY OF NEWARK (CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API