Legal Opinion

Kuehn v. Dix

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1906No. 5937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Stevens county, Carey, J., entered June 9, 1905, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff after a trial before the court without a jury, in an action to recover damages from a fire set out by an adjoining landowner.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

— This action was commenced in the superior court of Stevens county, by the respondent, M. A. Kuehn, against the appellant, Fred Dix, to recover damages sustained *533by the destruction of her crops and injury to her land by fire. Respondent’s land lies immediately north of, and contiguous to, that of appellant. A large portion of the appellant’s and respondent’s ranches consists of low bottom land, the soil being formed from decomposed roots, willows, grass, tules, and other vegetation. During a portion of the year these lands are under water, which runs off during the summer months and…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lehman v. Maryott & Spencer Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Sandberg v. Cavanaugh Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Pettigrew v. McCoy-loggie Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API