Legal Opinion

Reddavide v. Laskowitz

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided June 7, 1926PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

This is a bill in the nature of an interpleader. The complainants sought a mortgage on their property through one Kleinman. The defendants Chirelstein and Bell, and also defendant Leskowitz, all of whom had made loans through Kleinman before, examined the property and agreed to make the loan. On October 14th, 1924, complainants and the defendants Chirelstein and Bell met in Kleinman's office. Complainants executed a mortgage, and, at least, one bond. Chirelstein and Bell thereupon gave complainants checks for the agreed upon consideration, about $1,700. Complainants supposed, as did…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Putnam v. ClarkNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1878
  2. Putnam v. ClarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1880
  3. Vredenburgh v. BurnetNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1879

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sabatino v. D'AloiseNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API