Legal Opinion
Priest v. Exposition Cotton Mills
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 20, 1952No. 34036PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, C.J.
The claimant conceded in his application for a review of the settlement agreement that such application, on the ground of a change in condition alone, was made too late. Code (Ann.), § 114-709; Kirkland v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp., 69 Ga. App. 433 (25 S. E. 2d, 723). He moved to set aside the settlement on the ground that it was procured by fraud. The board apparently recognized that even if the approved settlement agreement had been procured by fraud, it could not be reviewed on that ground more than two years after notice of final payment of compensation under the agreement had…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Davis v. BoyettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Anderson v. FosterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- American National Bank v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Georgia Marine Salvage Co. v. MerrittCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Middleton v. PrudenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Webb v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Metlife v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Simpson v. Travelers Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- General Insurance Co. of America v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. GrooverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.