Legal Opinion

City of Kansas City v. Carlock

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided March 19, 1987No. 59,101PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Benson, J.:

On July 26, 1985, Ronnell A. Carlock (defendant-appellant) was charged with two violations of Kansas City, Kansas, municipal ordinances upon the complaint of a city zoning inspector. Ordinance numbers cited were 27-41.2A and 27-41.3F. A third charge, violation of Municipal Ordinance 21-29, was apparently added by oral amendment. Carlock was found guilty of all three charges in municipal court and was fined $1,500. He filed a timely notice of appeal to the district court.

The district court found Carlock guilty of violating municipal ordinances 21-29-4, 27-41.2A(2), and 27-41.3F. He…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. MinorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  2. State v. Howell & TaylorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  3. State v. Robinson, Lloyd & ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  4. City of Altamont v. FinkleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  5. Wisner v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Nieblas-DuarteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  2. State v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  3. State v. LeachCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  4. State v. BoyleCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1996
  5. State v. LeachCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API