Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. Cazares

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 14, 1981No. 80-1199PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

413 So.2d 1192 (1981)

Mary Sue HUBBARD, Appellant,

v.

Gabriel CAZARES and Margaret Cazares, Appellees.

No. 80-1199.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 14, 1981.

Paul Antinori, Jr., Tampa, for appellant.

Walt Logan, St. Petersburg, Wagner, Cunningham, Vaughan, Genders & McLaughlin, Tampa, and Joel D. Eaton of Podhurst, Orseck & Parks, Miami, for appellees.

DANAHY, Judge.

Gabriel and Margaret Cazares brought this suit against Mary Sue Hubbard and The Church of Scientology of California, Inc. (the Church) for damages based on alleged malicious prosecution, abuse of process, and…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Receivers Middlesex Banking Co. v. Realty Investment Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  2. Killearn Properties, Inc. v. LambrightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. State Ex Rel. Eli Lilly and Company v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  4. Green v. RothDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  5. Berard Construction Co. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Babcock v. WhatmoreSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  2. Cumberland Software, Inc. v. GREAT AM. MORTG.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. Florida Department of Children and Families v. Sun-Sentinel, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2004
  4. State v. Omega Painting, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Arch Aluminum & Glass Co., Inc. v. HaneyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API