Legal Opinion

State v. Haynes

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 20, 2020No. WD-18-087, WD-18-088PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State v. Haynes,

2020-Ohio-1049.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WOOD COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals Nos. WD-18-087 WD-18-088 Appellee Trial Court Nos. 2018CR0105 v. 2018CR0351 Samuel S. Haynes, Sr. DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellant Decided: March 20, 2020 ***** Paul A. Dobson, Wood County Prosecuting Attorney, and David T. Harold, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Lawrence A. Gold, for appellant. ***** ZMUDA, P.J. I. Introduction {¶ 1} In this consolidated appeal, appellant, Samuel Haynes, Sr., appeals the judgment of the Wood County Court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. TenaceOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. WereOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. BrinkleyOhio Supreme Court · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. HollingsheadOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  2. State v. RobinsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. State v. LoofbourrowOhio Court of Appeals · 2026
  4. State v. PasterchikOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. State v. RedmondOhio Court of Appeals · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API