IGA Aluminum Products, Inc. v. Manufacturers Bank
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT. *
Plaintiff, the provider of materials under a subcontract on a construction project, appeals from an order granting summary judgment in favor of defendant, the construction lender. The motion for summary judgment, based on uncontradicted facts, was granted because the preliminary notice required by statute was not delivered by certified or registered mail. With reference to the appeal, we reject plaintiffs contention that delivery of the preliminary notice by regular first class mail represents substantial compliance with notice requirements here pertinent and therefore…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Connolly Development, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Romak Iron Works v. Prudential Insurance of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Wand Corp. v. San Gabriel Valley Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- Skivers v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- People v. Pacific Guano Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Halbert's Lumber, Inc. v. Lucky Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Truestone, Inc. v. Simi West Industrial Park IICalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Harold L. James, Inc. v. Five Points Ranch, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- Industrial Asphalt, Inc. v. Garrett Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- Brewer Corp. v. Point Center Financial, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.