Legal Opinion

Geduldig v. Posner

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 29, 1999No. 497, Sept. Term, 1999PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EYLER, Judge.

In these two consolidated actions, based on claims of undue influence and fraud, claimants seek to (1) set aside a will and a revocable trust, (2) impose a constructive trust, and (3) be awarded compensatory and punitive damages. The question is whether the evidence is legally sufficient to create a fact question and thereby avoid summary judgment in favor of the defendants. We answer that question in the affirmative and, consequently, reverse the judgment of the circuit court. For the benefit of the court on remand, we shall discuss whether Maryland recognizes the tort of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Alexander & Alexander Inc. v. B. Dixon Evander & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. K & K Management, Inc. v. Chul Woo LeeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  3. Southland Corp. v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Kann v. KannCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  5. White v. FrielCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fell v. RamboCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  2. Thacker v. City of HyattsvilleCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. In re Estate of ClingerNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Garcia v. Foulger Pratt Development, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. Prudential Securities Inc. v. E-Net, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API