Legal Opinion

Mullin v. Roy

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 20, 2010No. S10F1120PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NAHMIAS, Justice.

The principal issue in this appeal is whether trial courts have the authority under the current version of the child support guidelines statute, OCGA § 19-6-15, to order lump-sum payment of child support obligations. We hold that trial courts do have such discretion, and we also find appellant’s other claims to be meritless. Accordingly, we affirm.

1. Appellant Scott J. Mullin (husband) and appellee Lacey E. Roy (wife) married on December 21, 2004. They have two children. Husband was a senior systems engineer for Cox Newspapers making approximately $80,000 a year, while wife…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bloomfield v. BloomfieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  2. Norman v. AultSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  3. Cheeks v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  4. Mell v. MellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  5. Arrington v. ArringtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fulton County v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
  2. Trotman v. VELOCITEACH PROJECT MANAGEMENT, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  3. In re Judicial Qualifications Commission Formal Advisory Opinion No. 239Supreme Court of Georgia · 2016
  4. Canady v. Cumberland Harbour Property Owners Association, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  5. HART v. BURFORD, JUDGESupreme Court of Georgia · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API