Legal Opinion
State v. Hunter
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided September 18, 2000No. 44155-8-IPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
9 P.3d 872 (2000)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
James Oliver HUNTER, Jr., Appellant.
No. 44155-8-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
September 18, 2000.
Cheryl D. Aza, Seattle, for Appellant.
Charles Zachery Silverman, Pros. Atty., Friday Harbor, Philip James Buri, Brett & Daugert, Bellingham, for Respondent.
WEBSTER, J.
Appellant James Hunter argues that the trial court's imposition of drug fund contribution as part of his sentence was not statutorily authorized and violates the separation of powers doctrine, procedural due process guarantees, and the equal protection guarantee. We…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. HansenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
- Fidelity National Title Co. v. First American Title Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. GronnertCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- State v. GronnertCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- State v. J.V.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.