Legal Opinion

Forest Guardians v. United States Forest Service

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 20, 2007No. 07-1020PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUCERO, Circuit Judge.

Forest Guardians 1 appeal a district court decision finding that the United States Forest Service (“USFS”) complied with the relevant laws in approving the County Line Vegetation Management Project. They argue that USFS: (1) violated the National Forest Management Act (“NFMA”), 16 U.S.C. § 1604(b), by failing to collect actual population data for management indicator species (“MIS”); (2) failed to provide substantial evidence for its conclusion that the relevant soil standard would be met; and (3) violated the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Department of Transportation v. Public CitizenSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Don Olenhouse v. Commodity Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. New Mexico Ex Rel. Richardson v. Bureau of Land ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  2. Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. v. Kansas Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  3. Town of Winthrop v. AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  4. Biodiversity Conservation Alliance v. JironCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  5. WildEarth Guardians v. United States Bureau of Land ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API