Legal Opinion

Connell v. Brink

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 29, 1993No. Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly settled the record to include a map that purported to depict the north campus side of the University of Buffalo because that map was considered by the court in determining defendant’s motion for summary judgment (see, CPLR 5526). That map, however, which was concededly prepared after the accident, did not constitute the tender of "evidentiary proof in admissible form” (Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562; cf., Collins v Tashjian, 124 AD2d 629, 630), and thus, should not have been considered by Supreme…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Collins v. TashjianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Zawatski v. Cheektowaga-Maryvale Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Russell v. GainesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. HAJDAJ, TONI v. ZUBIN, JESSICA M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API