Stringham v. Cook
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Brown Co.unty. The facts are stated in the opinion. Judgment was entered on the special verdict, in favor of the plaintiff, for $1,600 and costs. The defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtOetoN, J.
The plaintiff brings this action of replevin, alleging that he was the owner and entitled to the possession of certain pine saw-logs, cedar railroad ties and posts, and cedar logs and timber, of the value of $2,994.58, and that the defendants wrongfully took said' property from the possession of the plaintiff and from his land, and wrongfully detain the same. The defendants answered by general denial, and tendering judgment for $375, and filed an affidavit that if any such timber was cut by them on said land it was done by mistake. The timber had been manufactured and sold, and therefore…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hutchinson v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
- Weisel v. SpenceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Eberhardt v. SangerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- McNarra v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
- Williams v. PorterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Grainger v. StillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- Life & Casualty Insurance v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1927
- Murphey v. WeilWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
- Burgess v. Mercantile Town Mutual InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
- Bullen v. Milwaukee Trading Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.