Legal Opinion

Tillery v. Weitzenfeld

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 20, 1974No. 73-2632PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We find ourselves, because of an incomplete record and summary disposition below, unable to rule in this appeal and accordingly vacate the district court order denying a petition for writ of ha-beas corpus and remand for further proceedings.

*180After being charged, convicted for breaking and entering and sentenced to a term of five years in state confinement by a Florida court in Manatee County on July 12, 1971, the petitioner was delivered to authorities in an adjoining county, Sarasota, for prosecution on an additional state charge pending there, the offense there charged also being breaking…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Smith v. HooeySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Dickey v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Jack Shields v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Larry L. Tillery, 28355-120 v. Richard W. Weitzenfeld, as Sheriff of Manatee County, Florida, Etc., No. 73-2632 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part ICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API