Legal Opinion

Hotel 71 Mezz Lender v. Rosenblatt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 2, 2009PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered February 11, 2009, which, inter alia, granted petitioner judgment creditor’s application to compel respondent former receiver to turn over $1.335 million in partial satisfaction of the judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

On June 30, 2008, intervenor-respondent Guy T. Mitchell, having been held liable in an action to enforce a guaranty of payment for a judgment of $52,404,066.54 (see Hotel 71 Mezz Lender LLC v Mitchell, 63 AD3d 447 [2009]), made a wire transfer in the amount of $1.335 million from a Florida bank…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hotel 71 Mezz Lendek LLC v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Hotel 71 Mezz Lender LLC v. FalorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matter of Puerto v. DoarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. Puerto v. DoarNew York Supreme Court · 2013
  3. 320 West 13th Street, LLC v. Wolf Shevack, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API