Legal Opinion

United States v. Candido Ortiz-Martinez, United States of America v. Gabriel Jaime Ramirez-Nazar, United States of America v. Carlos Fuentez, Also Known as Carlos Fuentes, Also Known as Pupo, Also Known as Pupoo, United States of America v. Stanley Pruitt, United States of America v. Jorge Rodriguez-Calderon, Also Known as Koki, United States of America v. Francisco Santana

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 7, 1993No. 91-3858Published

1Opinion of the Court

1 F.3d 662

38 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1496

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,

v.

Candido ORTIZ-MARTINEZ, Appellant.

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,

v.

Gabriel Jaime RAMIREZ-NAZAR, Appellant.

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,

v.

Carlos FUENTEZ, also known as Carlos Fuentes, also known as

Pupo, also known as Pupoo, Appellant.

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,

v.

Stanley PRUITT, Appellant.

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,

v.

Jorge RODRIGUEZ-CALDERON, also known as Koki, Appellant.

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,

v.

Francisco SANTANA, Appellant.

Nos. 91-3856, 91-3858, 91-3866, 91-3872, 91-3873, 91-3875.

Uni…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Deal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. Michael BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. LucasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API