Eberhard F. Cimijotti v. Frances Paulsen, Clarice Sprout, Lauretta M. Cimijotti
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Per curiam
The appeal is from an order of the District Court overruling motions to require some witnesses to answer certain questions asked of them in depositions taken by the plaintiff (here appellant) for discovery purposes under Rule 26(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A. The defendants (here appellees) have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for want of a final order or judgment. The motion to dismiss is granted.
Rulings on the propriety or impropriety of incidents of deposition-taking under Rule 26 in a pending suit are not “final decisions” within the general right of appeal…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Alexander v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Thomas French & Sons, Ltd. v. International Braid Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1945
- Dille v. Carter Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
3Cited by11 opinions
- Republic Gear Company v. Borg-Warner CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- George P. Baker v. United States Steel Corporation, Edgewater Steel CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Gowin v. Hazen Memorial Hospital Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Granger v. Deaconess Hospital of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
- Budge v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.