State v. McCarley
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Greene, J.:
The State of Kansas appeals the district court’s denial of its motion to correct an illegal sentence, arguing that the court had a duty to correct the sentence after the defendant, Steven M. McCarley, was sentenced based upon a presentence investigation report (PSI) that misidentified the correct severity level for die precise crime of conviction. We conclude that the State’s stipulation to the PSI at time of sentencing and the State’s failure to timely appeal the sentence require that we affirm the district court. We also conclude that McCarley’s cross-appeal is meritless.
Factual…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- State v. SchoonoverSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- State v. HebertSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
- State v. BryanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- State v. KunellisSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- State v. PabstSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. McCarleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- State v. HankinsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014
- Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports2008
- State v. McCarleyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007