Legal Opinion
Romagnola v. Gillespie, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 2, 2008No. A-57 September Term 2007PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rivera-Soto
Our Rules of Court are subject to periodic review and, as needed, amendment. On rare occasions, a change in a Rule occurs while a lawsuit is pending and a party to that suit, who properly invoked that Rule in its pre-amendment form, is unable to conform its earlier compliance to the amended Rule. As a result, that party is unable to enjoy the advantage its compliance with the earlier version of the Rule would have provided.
This appeal presents that rare instance. When that quandary arises, Rule 1:1-2, which allows for the relaxation of any Rule of Court “if adherence to it would result in an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Busik v. LevineSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Bender v. AdelsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
- Crudup v. MarreroSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- Stone v. Township of Old BridgeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Brunson v. Affinity Federal Credit UnionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
- State v. JacksonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
- State v. ReeveyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
- Seoung Ouk Cho v. Trinitas Regional MedicalNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015
- Kas Oriental Rugs, Inc. v. EllmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.