Legal Opinion

Nuzum v. Field

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 16, 2013PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered April 17, 2012, which granted defendant attorney’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against him, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff established an issue of fact as to whether an attorney-client relationship existed between her and defendant Field, with her sworn testimony that defendant expressly undertook to prepare promissory notes for her, albeit with the fees paid by another (see Jane St. Co. v Rosenberg & Estis, 192 AD2d 451 [1st Dept 1993], lv denied 82 NY2d 654 [1993]). However,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shumsky v. EisensteinNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Estate of Nevelson v. Carro, Spanbock, Kaster & CuiffoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Jane Street Co. v. RosenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wadsworth Condos, LLC v. Dollinger Gonski & GrossmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Brion v. MoreiraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  3. Wadsworth Condos, LLC v. Dollinger Gonski & GrossmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API