Legal Opinion

State v. Doyle

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1981No. 7384PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant was convicted at a bench trial in the district court of the offense of promoting a detrimental drug in the third degree under HRS § 712-1249. She appeals from the judgment and sentence of the trial court. We affirm.

The only issue 1 which merits this court’s consideration is whether the trial court erred in directing that the defendant’s motion to suppress and the trial on the merits be heard contemporaneously.

The federal courts have taken the position that pursuant to Rule 12(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, see United States v. Thompson, 558 F.2d 522 (9th Cir.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anton Vaughn Evalt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  2. State v. TexeiraHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  3. United States v. MihalopoulosDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1964

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. KalunaHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. ChangHawaii Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State v. ThomasHawaii Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. ShiversHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API