Prest-O-Lite Co. v. Bournonville
District Court, D. New Jersey
In Equity. Suit by the Prest-O-Lite Company against Camille Bournonville and Ida Bournonville, his wife. On motion to modify interlocutory decree.
1Opinion of the Court
HAIGHT, District Judge.
The defendants seek to have modified that part of the interlocutory decree, entered herein on November 11, 1914, which adjudged that the complainant recover from the defendants all of the profits, gains, and advantages which the latter had derived from the sale of gas cylinders or tanks bearing the trade-mark “Prest-O-Fite,” and containing any other material than that prepared and placed therein by the complainant. It is urged that the defendants should respond only for the damages suffered by the complainant, because the basis of the decree was not an infringement of a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Searchlight Gas Co. v. Prest-O-Lite Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1914
- Prest-O-Lite Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
- Wolf Bros. & Co. v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
- General Electric Co. v. Re-New Lamp Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1904
- P. E. Sharpless Co. v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hitchcock v. American Plate Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1919