Legal Opinion

United China & Glass Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 5, 1958No. 62058; protest 316191-K/14980 (New Orleans)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the decorated earthenware wall planters are entireties in chief value of decorated earthenware, not tableware, valued at over $3 per dozen, said merchandise was held dutiable at 10 cents per dozen pieces and 35 percent ad valorem under paragraph 211, as modified, supra, if the body is wholly of clay, or as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52476), if the body is not wholly of clay. The claim that the specific rate…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Castelazo & Associates v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  2. Capri Creations v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API