United States v. Mendez
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Armando Mendez appeals the sentence imposed after he pled guilty in 2018 to violating 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1), which prohibits felons from possessing firearms. On appeal, he contends his sentence was improperly inflated because the district court held that a prior conviction for attempted robbery in Colorado qualified as a "crime of violence" under § 4B1.2(a) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines ("U.S.S.G." or "the guidelines"). We affirm.
I
Mr. Mendez entered an unconditional guilty plea but objected to the probation *1124 officer's presentence report, which calculated a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Moncrieffe v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Gonzales v. Duenas-AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. TittiesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. BabcockCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
- United States v. FaulknerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. VenjohnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
- United States v. LovatoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. VenenoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.