Legal Opinion

United States v. Mendez

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 17, 2019No. 18-1259PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.

Armando Mendez appeals the sentence imposed after he pled guilty in 2018 to violating 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1), which prohibits felons from possessing firearms. On appeal, he contends his sentence was improperly inflated because the district court held that a prior conviction for attempted robbery in Colorado qualified as a "crime of violence" under § 4B1.2(a) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines ("U.S.S.G." or "the guidelines"). We affirm.

I

Mr. Mendez entered an unconditional guilty plea but objected to the probation *1124 officer's presentence report, which calculated a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Moncrieffe v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Gonzales v. Duenas-AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. United States v. TittiesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  5. United States v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. BabcockCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
  2. United States v. FaulknerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. VenjohnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
  4. United States v. LovatoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  5. United States v. VenenoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API