Neville v. National Life & Accident Insurance
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The record properly presents two questions only for determination by this court: 1st. Should a new trial have been granted because of the error in the charge? 2d. Is there evidence to support the verdict? The second of these questions is sufficiently answered in the second headnote, and we will enlarge upon the first headnote only. The policy sued on contained the following clause: “No obligation is assumed by the company prior to the date hereof, nor unless on said date the assured is alive and in sound health.” The defendant on the trial contended that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gaston v. Gainesville & Dahlonega Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Hoxie v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Suple v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Duke v. HoganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Security Development & Investment Co. v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. HesterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- SCHOLLE ATLANTA CORPORATION v. NealyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Perlis v. HorneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- State Highway Department v. HandleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.