Legal Opinion

Parker v. Michigan National Bank (In re Parker)

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided August 10, 1988No. Bankruptcy No. HK 87 1105; Adv. No. 87 570PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LAURENCE E. HOWARD, Bankruptcy Judge.

NEW ISSUES AND RELIEF UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 60(b)

The court held a trial on March 31, 1988, on the debtors’ complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) to vacate that portion of the court’s order of April 28, 1987, which granted a replacement lien in 1987 crops to Michigan National Bank. At the conclusion of the trial the court adjourned the hearing to allow the submission of post-trial briefs.

On April 10, 1987, the debtors filed their petition under chapter 12. On that same day (not April 9th as stated in the complaint) the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Security Industrial BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. John T. Fackelman v. Griffin B. Bell, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. In the Matter of Numeric Corp., Bankrupt. Appeal of Russell E. BlankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
  4. Federal's, Inc. v. Edmonton Investment Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
  5. Pierce v. United Mine Workers of America Welfare & Retirement Fund for 1950 & 1974Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. All-Tex Staffing & Pers., Inc. v. Sarah Romo Torres (In re All-Tex Staffing & Pers., Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API