Legal Opinion

Searcy v. United States

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided August 6, 2018No. 2:16-cv-04266Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION Minor J.S. by her Next Friend JAMIE ) SEARCY, AND JAMIE AND NATHAN ) SEARCY, Individually, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Case No. 2:16-cv-04266-NKL ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Before the Court are Plaintiffs’ motions for substitution of party, Doc. 77, and to strike affirmative defenses, Doc. 85. For the following reasons, Plaintiffs’ motion for substitution of party, Doc. 77, is granted, and Plaintiffs’ motion to strike affirmative defenses, Doc. 85, is denied. I. Background In 2012,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashley County, Ark. v. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  2. Stanbury Law Firm, P.A. v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  3. Gustafson v. BendaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  4. Bjc Health System v. Columbia Casualty Company, Atg Assurance Company Limited v. Columbia Casualty Company, Doing Business as Cna HealthproCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  5. Lester v. SaylesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API