Williams v. Mehra
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1DissentKeith, Circuit Judge
I continue to believe that the course of treatment adopted by Defendants Cabrera and Rodriguez constituted an obvious disregard for Anthony Wade’s serious medical needs. Consequently, I must respectfully dissent from the portion of my colleagues’ opinion which finds that Defendants Cabrera and Rodriguez are entitled to qualified immunity. I concur, however, in the disposition as it relates to Defendant Mehra.
1. Jurisdiction
On the issue of jurisdiction, I agree with the majority that the issue presented in this matter turns on questions of law, not of fact, thereby entitling us to jurisdiction…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Sanderfer v. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Williams v. MehraCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.