Legal Opinion · Dissent

Williams v. Mehra

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 4, 1999No. 97-1118Published

1DissentKeith, Circuit Judge

I continue to believe that the course of treatment adopted by Defendants Cabrera and Rodriguez constituted an obvious disregard for Anthony Wade’s serious medical needs. Consequently, I must respectfully dissent from the portion of my colleagues’ opinion which finds that Defendants Cabrera and Rodriguez are entitled to qualified immunity. I concur, however, in the disposition as it relates to Defendant Mehra.

1. Jurisdiction

On the issue of jurisdiction, I agree with the majority that the issue presented in this matter turns on questions of law, not of fact, thereby entitling us to jurisdiction…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Sanderfer v. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  5. Williams v. MehraCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API