Ferguson v. State

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

Following his conviction by a jury of robbery by intimidation, Ramon Earl Ferguson appeals, arguing that (1) the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict, and that the trial court erred (2) in admitting certain evidence, and (3) by denying his ineffective assistance of counsel claim. For the reasons that follow, we find no error and affirm.

1. Ferguson contends that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction. We disagree. On appeal from a criminal conviction, the evidence must be viewed in a light most favorable to the verdict, and an appellant…