Legal Opinion

Solomon Solar Salt Co. v. Barber

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 10, 1897No. 9852PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from Saline District Court. Hon. R. F. Thompson, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtDoster, C. J.

This was an action brought by M. W. Barber, as owner, on a note of which the fol-is a

This note is made in accordance with and subject to the terms of a certain letter, dated Sept. 24, 1892, addressed to John R. Ranson by S. E. Baker. S. E. Baker. O. I. Pettibone.

KANSAS ClTY, Mo.,’

Ann nn $3,000.00

Oct. lgt> 1892<

Six months after date, we promise to pay to John R. Ranson, or order, at the National Bank of Kansas City, three thousand dollars, for value received, with interest from date at the rate of six per cent, per annum.

Solomon Solar Salt Co.

By S. E. Baker, Prest.

John R. Ranson, Sec. <& Treas.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Miller v. EdgertonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Clark v. E. C. Clark Machine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Starwich v. Washington Cut Glass Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. McCray v. Sapulpa Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Abercrombie v. Bear Canon Coal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  5. Saline Valley Bank v. PeckhamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API