Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Trickel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 26, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrew Iii, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed February 1, 1996, which ruled that claimant did not sustain a consequential causally related injury to his back.

On April 27, 1988, while in the course of his employment as a carpenter, claimant fell and fractured his right tibia and *779fibula.* Claimant’s application for workers’ compensation benefits was granted and he was found to have a 75% causally related permanent disability to and a 22½% schedule loss of use of the right leg. Thereafter, on December 22, 1991, claimant again was injured when he twisted his lower back while…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Claim of August v. Chromalloy R & TAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Claim of Barre v. Roofing & Flooring, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Claim of Scofield v. City of Beacon Police DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Claim of Wallace v. Oswego Wire, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Matter of Smith v. Rochester-Genesee Regional Transp. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API