In re the Claim of Trickel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtCrew Iii, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed February 1, 1996, which ruled that claimant did not sustain a consequential causally related injury to his back.
On April 27, 1988, while in the course of his employment as a carpenter, claimant fell and fractured his right tibia and *779fibula.* Claimant’s application for workers’ compensation benefits was granted and he was found to have a 75% causally related permanent disability to and a 22½% schedule loss of use of the right leg. Thereafter, on December 22, 1991, claimant again was injured when he twisted his lower back while…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Claim of August v. Chromalloy R & TAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Claim of Barre v. Roofing & Flooring, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
3Cited by3 opinions
- Claim of Scofield v. City of Beacon Police DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Claim of Wallace v. Oswego Wire, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Matter of Smith v. Rochester-Genesee Regional Transp. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019