Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Brock

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 23, 2013PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice TODD.

In this appeal by the Commonwealth, we accepted review to consider whether Ap-*1016pellee John Brock waived his speedy trial claim under Pa.R.Crim.P. 600, either by failing to file a written motion to dismiss, or by failing to appear for a trial listing. We hold that Rule 600 requires a defendant to file a written motion to dismiss, and that, by failing to appear in court on the day his or her case is listed for trial, a defendant waives his or her Rule 600 claim. Accordingly, we reverse.

On June 3, 2003, the Commonwealth filed a criminal complaint against Brock, charging him…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BlairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. SELENSKISupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Commonwealth v. LamonnaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Jones v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. DrakeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RolesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Commonwealth v. Barbour, D., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Commonwealth v. ColonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Commonwealth v. WendelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Commonwealth v. ThompsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API