Commonwealth v. Brock
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice TODD.
In this appeal by the Commonwealth, we accepted review to consider whether Ap-*1016pellee John Brock waived his speedy trial claim under Pa.R.Crim.P. 600, either by failing to file a written motion to dismiss, or by failing to appear for a trial listing. We hold that Rule 600 requires a defendant to file a written motion to dismiss, and that, by failing to appear in court on the day his or her case is listed for trial, a defendant waives his or her Rule 600 claim. Accordingly, we reverse.
On June 3, 2003, the Commonwealth filed a criminal complaint against Brock, charging him…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BlairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. SELENSKISupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. LamonnaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Jones v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. DrakeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RolesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. Barbour, D., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Commonwealth v. ColonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. WendelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth v. ThompsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.