Parosa v. City of Tacoma
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
This appeal brings here for review two actions which were consolidated for trial, both involving an attempted incorporation of a fourth-class town.2
Appellant Parosa and others petitioned to incorporate a fourth-class town containing two large tracts of land connected by a very narrow strip. The easterly tract comprises one fourth of the area and includes all but forty-three of the residents of the projected town. The other tract contains over one thousand acres and is owned by the Port of Tacoma which has comprehensive long-range plans for the development of its property for industrial…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Warner v. GoltraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Port of Tacoma v. ParosaWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- Mudgett v. LiebesWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- State ex rel. Cummings v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co. v. Franklin CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1919
3Cited by6 opinions
- King County Water District No. 90 v. City of RentonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Johnson v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Self v. RhayWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- State ex rel. Thompson v. CarrollWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- State ex rel. Town of Mercer Island v. City of Mercer IslandWashington Supreme Court · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.