Legal Opinion

Parosa v. City of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1960No. 35022PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

This appeal brings here for review two actions which were consolidated for trial, both involving an attempted incorporation of a fourth-class town.2

Appellant Parosa and others petitioned to incorporate a fourth-class town containing two large tracts of land connected by a very narrow strip. The easterly tract comprises one fourth of the area and includes all but forty-three of the residents of the projected town. The other tract contains over one thousand acres and is owned by the Port of Tacoma which has comprehensive long-range plans for the development of its property for industrial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Warner v. GoltraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Port of Tacoma v. ParosaWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Mudgett v. LiebesWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  4. State ex rel. Cummings v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co. v. Franklin CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. King County Water District No. 90 v. City of RentonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  2. Johnson v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  3. Self v. RhayWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. State ex rel. Thompson v. CarrollWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. State ex rel. Town of Mercer Island v. City of Mercer IslandWashington Supreme Court · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API