Legal Opinion

Killian v. Lawson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 27, 1978No. 77-2099PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LETTS, Judge.

This is an appeal from a ruling that a divorced man, who pays $1,000 a month alimony, which constitutes the sole support of his ex-wife, is entitled to the exemption of wages from garnishment under § 222.11 Fla.Stat. (1975). We affirm.

The appellant refers to several cases holding that a divorced man, with no minor children to support, is not the “head of a family.” Anderson v. Anderson, 44 So.2d 652 (Fla.1950); In Re: Estate of Deem, 297 So.2d 611 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); In Re: Estate of Van Meter, 214 So.2d 639 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1968), affirmed 231 So.2d 524 (Fla.1970); and Jordan v.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  2. Slatcoff v. DezenSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  3. Patten Package Co. v. HouserSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  4. In Re Estate of Van MeterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  5. Jordan v. JordanSupreme Court of Florida · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Killian v. LawsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. In Re MorrowUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1990
  3. Dena J. Ulisano v. Frederick Ulisano, III, a/k/a Rick Ulisano and Moredirect, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API