Killian v. Lawson
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
LETTS, Judge.
This is an appeal from a ruling that a divorced man, who pays $1,000 a month alimony, which constitutes the sole support of his ex-wife, is entitled to the exemption of wages from garnishment under § 222.11 Fla.Stat. (1975). We affirm.
The appellant refers to several cases holding that a divorced man, with no minor children to support, is not the “head of a family.” Anderson v. Anderson, 44 So.2d 652 (Fla.1950); In Re: Estate of Deem, 297 So.2d 611 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); In Re: Estate of Van Meter, 214 So.2d 639 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1968), affirmed 231 So.2d 524 (Fla.1970); and Jordan v.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
- Slatcoff v. DezenSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Patten Package Co. v. HouserSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- In Re Estate of Van MeterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Jordan v. JordanSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Killian v. LawsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- In Re MorrowUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1990
- Dena J. Ulisano v. Frederick Ulisano, III, a/k/a Rick Ulisano and Moredirect, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015