Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hendley v. First Nat. Bank of Huntsville

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 7, 1937No. 8 Div. 792Published

1Dissent

(dissenting on rehearing) .

I am not in accord with the result announced. This suit is not between the original grantor and first mortgagee. If so, the result announced and rule applied would be that which I understand obtains.

It was a contest between the first and second mortgagee, which introduced the latter as a third party. The facts are thus stated in the opinion, Hendley et al. v. First National Bank of Huntsville, 234 Ala. 535, 176 So. 348, 349:

“In particular, the junior mortgagee challenges the senior mortgage as a subsisting lifen upon the ground that the same is barred by…

2Cases cited81 opinions

  1. Elmendorf v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  2. Landsdale v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. McArthur v. Carrie's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
  4. Wagner v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
  5. Fries v. Acme White Lead & Color WorksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API