Legal Opinion

Drake v. Shenandoah Pottery, Inc.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided July 15, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtShalleck, J.

This is a motion to vacate judgment and warrant of attachment. Stipulation entered into between the attorneys dated May 17, 1930, extending defendant’s time to answer does not constitute a general appearance. (Engels v. Ferguson, 79 Misc. 40.) (See, also, Bell v. Good, 19 N. Y. Supp. 693, 696; Benedict v. Arnoux, 38 id. 882; Paine Lumber Co. v. Galbraith, 38 App. Div. 68.)

Defendant is a foreign corporation, not authorized to do business in this State and has no office for the transaction of business in the city of New York. The plaintiff attached defendant’s property by serving summons and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Paine Lumber Co. v. GalbraithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  2. Bell v. GoodCity of New York Municipal Court · 1892
  3. Engels Express Co. v. FergusonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Martens v. Fernandez, New York County Courts1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API