Legal Opinion

Soloman v. Neidig

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided March 15, 1862PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by defendants from a judgment entered at the Trial-Term on the verdict of a jury. The facts fully appear in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

Brady, J.

The defendants purchased from the plaintiffs about three hundred dollars’ worth of bird cages. They were to be delivered at the store of the defendants, or one of them in Broadway, and were to be paid for in cash, five per cent, off, or by the note of the defendant Saas, at three months, endorsed by the defendant Heidig. The plaintiffs delivered about two hundred an d fifty-eight dollars worth of the goods, but did not deliver the balance “ because the defendants bad failed—one of them—and there was an assignee’s sale at the store.” The note was not demanded of either of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mead v. DegolyerNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  2. Paige v. OttNew York Supreme Court · 1848
  3. Malin v. RoseNew York Supreme Court · 1834

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Corrigan v. SheffieldNew York Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Timmons v. NelsonNew York Supreme Court · 1873

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API