Legal Opinion

Broz v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 23, 2013No. 12-1403PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROGERS, Circuit Judge.

Robert and Kimberly Broz appeal the judgment of the United States Tax Court affirming the Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s finding of an $18 million deficiency in their joint tax filings for the years 1996, 1998, 1999, 2000, and 2001. Robert Broz claims that he was “at risk” and had sufficient debt basis in Alpine PCS, a subchapter S corporation, to deduct its pass-through losses. Broz also argues that he made valid business-expense and amortization deductions for the activities of the Alpine license-holding entities, which were limited-liability companies taxed…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Higgins v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Moline Properties, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Lexecon Inc. v. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & LerachSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Commissioner v. National Alfalfa Dehydrating & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Burnet v. Commonwealth Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Robert F Broz v. Plante & Moran PllcMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Homero F. Meruelo v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  3. Barry G. Conner & Bridget H. Conner v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2018
  4. Blonde Grayson Hall, Neal Hall, Administrator and Neal Hall v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2014
  5. Homero F. Meruelo v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API